The relationship that needs scrutiny is usually the supplier.
Who owns the company, who stands behind it, whether anyone connected to it appears on a sanctions or PEP list, and whether anything has changed since the contract was awarded.
Who are you awarding this to, and can you show your working?
Public bodies need a consistent and defensible way to assess the third parties they engage. IQON provides the screening, ownership information, structured review and evidence trail behind supplier and counterparty decisions — consistently, and in a form that can be examined afterwards.
Company and entity lookup
Ownership and UBO information
PEP and sanctions screening
Adverse media
Risk classification
Ongoing monitoring and change detection
Structured information and document collection
Evidence of review and decisions
What public bodies get from it
Consistency
The same checks, in the same order, on every third party — regardless of who runs the process.
Transparency
What was examined and what was found, visible rather than held by an individual.
Accountability
Every decision carries a named person and the reasoning behind it.
Structured decisions
Multi-participant review and approval, sequenced with owners and deadlines.
Continuing oversight
Monitoring continues after award, not only during procurement.
Evidence and audit trail
A defensible account, available when the decision is examined later.
Alongside procurement and case systems, not instead of them.
IQON does not attempt to model procurement rules or public-administration frameworks. Those live in your own systems and your own policy.
What IQON provides is the due-diligence layer underneath: the screening, the ownership picture, the structured review and the record of what was decided.